Online dating paranoia

Although past studies include both positive and negative findings.

However, numerous studies have investigated attributional biases in the interpretation of events, and have shown a general tendency for attributing responsibility to other people rather than situations for negative events.

The receiver has no control and must accept any amount that the dictator offers.

Theoretical predictions based on short-term, payoff-maximising preferences state that dictators will keep all the money – but this prediction is frequently refuted.

In other words, they might be motivated by self-interest.

Moreover, the payoffs in a Dictator Game are determined entirely by the dictator, which rules out the possibility that dictator decisions are based on the anticipated responses of their partners, which would introduce other within-game strategic motivations.

The Dictator Game is particularly suited to paranoia research as the motives underpinning decision-making in this task are ambiguous with respect to harmful intent.

Current definitions of paranoia include two key components: unfounded ideas of harm and the idea that the harm is intended by others.

However, attributions of harmful intent have been poorly studied and mainly using artificial scenarios rather than participation in genuine social interactions where genuine resources are at stake.

Search for online dating paranoia:

online dating paranoia-45online dating paranoia-64

Counter to the researchers’ predictions, they found that people with high levels of paranoia were less likely to make attributions of intent and blame in the vignette describing intentional harm than people with low levels of paranoia but more likely to ascribe blame and intent in the vignette describing non-intentional harm.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “online dating paranoia”